Trumping Norms: Lab Evidence on Aggressive Communication before and after the 2016 US Presidential Election
American Economic Review
vol. 107,
no. 5, May 2017
(pp. 120-24)
Abstract
This paper provides evidence from a negotiation experiment that the 2016 US presidential election of Donald Trump had a profound impact on individual behavior in the lab. Using a Battle of the Sexes game with unstructured communication, we find that post-election individuals are less cooperative in general, more likely to use adversarial negotiation strategies, and less likely to reach an agreement. Furthermore, this is particularly driven by men acting more aggressively toward women. Our results are robust to controlling for sample selection. These results suggest that Trump's election may have disrupted community norms around civility and chivalry.Citation
Huang, Jennie, and Corinne Low. 2017. "Trumping Norms: Lab Evidence on Aggressive Communication before and after the 2016 US Presidential Election." American Economic Review, 107 (5): 120-24. DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20171016Additional Materials
JEL Classification
- C91 Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
- D12 Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
- D72 Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
- D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
- J16 Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination