By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Dynamic Inconsistency in Risky Choice: Evidence from the Lab and Field
Rawley Heimer
Zwetelina Iliewa
Alex Imas
Martin Weber
American Economic Review (Forthcoming)
Abstract
We document a robust dynamic inconsistency in risky choice. Using a unique brokerage
dataset and a series of experiments, we compare people's initial risk-taking plans to their
subsequent decisions. Across settings, people accept risk as part of a "loss-exit" strategy—planning to continue taking risk after gains and stopping after losses. Actual behavior deviates
from initial strategies by cutting gains early and chasing losses. More people accept
risk when offered a commitment to their initial strategy. Our results help reconcile seemingly
contradictory findings on risk-taking in static versus dynamic contexts. We explore
implications for theory and welfare.