American Economic Review
ISSN 0002-8282 (Print) | ISSN 1944-7981 (Online)
Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences: On the Elicitation of Time Preference under Conditions of Risk: Comment
American Economic Review
vol. 105,
no. 7, July 2015
(pp. 2242–60)
Abstract
Andreoni and Sprenger (2012a, b) report evidence that distinct utility functions govern choices under certainty and risk. I investigate the robustness of this result to the experimental design. I find that the effect disappears completely when a multiple price list instrument is used instead of a convex time budget design. Alternatively, the effect is reduced by half when sooner and later payment risks are realized using a single lottery instead of two independent lotteries. The result is thus at least partially driven by intertemporal diversification, supporting an explanation in terms of concavity of the intertemporal, and not only atemporal, utility function. (JEL C91, D81, D91)Citation
Cheung, Stephen L. 2015. "Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences: On the Elicitation of Time Preference under Conditions of Risk: Comment." American Economic Review, 105 (7): 2242–60. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20120946Additional Materials
JEL Classification
- C91 Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
- D81 Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
- D15 Intertemporal Household Choice; Life Cycle Models and Saving