American Economic Journal:
Economic Policy
ISSN 1945-7731 (Print) | ISSN 1945-774X (Online)
Does School Desegregation Promote Diverse Interactions? An Equilibrium Model of Segregation within Schools
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy
vol. 12,
no. 2, May 2020
(pp. 228–57)
Abstract
This paper studies racial segregation in schools using data on student friendships from Add Health. I estimate an equilibrium model of friendship formation, with preferences allowing both homophily and heterophily in direct and indirect ties. I find that homophily goes beyond direct links: students also prefer racially homogeneous indirect friends, while there is heterophily in income. I simulate policies reallocating students across schools. Race-based policies have nonlinear effects on within-school segregation and other network features such as clustering and centrality. Policies increasing diversity through reallocations based on income have less impact on racial segregation.Citation
Mele, Angelo. 2020. "Does School Desegregation Promote Diverse Interactions? An Equilibrium Model of Segregation within Schools." American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12 (2): 228–57. DOI: 10.1257/pol.20170604Additional Materials
JEL Classification
- H75 State and Local Government: Health; Education; Welfare; Public Pensions
- I21 Analysis of Education
- I28 Education: Government Policy
- J15 Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination
Missing Friends
However, the article does not report the number of students who report no friendships and friends that cannot be matched (e.g., outside school) to information necessary for the analysis. The number of students with no friends (is this a valid observation?), missing friends and non-matched friends is non-trivial (Fletcher JM, Ross SL. Estimating the effects of friends on health behaviors of adolescents. Health Econ. 2018;27(10):1450‐1483. doi:10.1002/hec.3780).
While the article makes both theoretical and empirical contributions, the potential for measurement error regarding friendship networks, which is unlikely to be random, may diminish the empirical contribution. The focus on 16 schools in 1994-95 also limits the external validity of the policy simulations.
I hope the author will provide information about the measurement issue I raise and whether it is likely to be important. Perhaps it is not.
, which is likely to be substantial