Team versus Individual Play in Finitely Repeated Prisoner Dilemma Games
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics
vol. 8,
no. 2, May 2016
(pp. 253-76)
Abstract
In finitely repeated prisoner dilemma games, two-person teams start with significantly less cooperation than individuals, consistent with results from the psychology literature. This quickly gives way to teams cooperating more than individuals. Team dialogues show increased payoffs from cooperation, along with anticipating opponents’ recognition of the same, provides the basis for cooperation, even while fully anticipating defection near the end game. A strong status quo bias in defecting across super-games limits unraveling. Defecting typically occurs one round earlier across super-games, consistent with low marginal, or even negative, benefits of more than one-step-ahead defection. (JEL C72, C73, C90, D12)Citation
Kagel, John H., and Peter McGee. 2016. "Team versus Individual Play in Finitely Repeated Prisoner Dilemma Games." American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 8 (2): 253-76. DOI: 10.1257/mic.20140068Additional Materials
JEL Classification
- C72 Noncooperative Games
- C73 Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games; Repeated Games
- C90 Design of Experiments: General
- D12 Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
There are no comments for this article.
Login to Comment