COVID-19 and Supply Chains
Paper Session
Tuesday, Jan. 5, 2021 3:45 PM - 5:45 PM (EST)
- Chair: Pol Antràs, Harvard University
Cutting Global Value Chains To Safeguard Against Foreign Shocks?
Abstract
The supply chain contagion sparked by the Covid-19 pandemic has brought an important question to the forefront of the policy debate: Can cutting global value chains (GVCs) benefit a country by shielding it from foreign shocks? Using a quantitative trade model we find that shutting down GVCs causes substantial welfare losses in all countries. In this counterfactual world without GVCs, the international repercussions of a Covid-19 shock in China are reduced on average, but magnified in some countries. A unilateral repatriation of all GVCs by the U.S. would reduce national welfare by 1.6% but barely change U.S. exposure to a foreign shock. More generally, we find across a wide range of scenarios that the reduction in shock exposure due to decoupling does not compensate the direct welfare costs.Sectoral Effects of Social Distancing
Abstract
The health crisis caused by the outbreak of the Covid-19 virus has led many countries to implement drastic social distancing rules. By reducing the quantity of labor, social distancing in turn leads to a drop in output which is difficult to quantify without taking into account relationships between sectors. Starting from a standard model of production networks, we analyze the sectoral effects of the shock in the case of France. We estimate that six weeks of social distancing brings GDP down by 5.6%. Apart from sectors directly concerned by social distancing measures, those whose value added decreases the most are upstream sectors, i.e. sectors most distant from final demand. The same exercise is carried out for other European countries, taking into account national differences in sectoral composition and propensity to telework. Finally, we analyze the economic impact of selectively phasing out social distancing by sector, region or age group.Supply Chain Bottlenecks in a Pandemic
Abstract
We consider how a firm’s position in a production network can make it essential for the production of specific goods and services. We develop a tractable theory of production networks which introduces the notion of a bottleneck: a firm whose removal from the network leads to a sufficiently large fall in aggregate output such that supply can no longer meet demand. The location of these bottlenecks can depend not only on a firm’s immediate connections, but also on the entire structure of the network. Building on the theoretical framework, we develop a network algorithm to identify bottlenecks in an economy wide production-network. The input to this algorithm is all transactions in an economy, the output is the set of bottleneck firms that preclude the economy from operating at first-best. We then apply these tools, at scale, in Uganda, as a proof of concept. We show that bottleneck firms have significantly larger profits, sales, wage bills, and have higher mark-ups. They are also located in industries which have fewer new entrants.Discussant(s)
David Rezza Baqaee
,
University of California-Los Angeles
Davin Chor
,
Dartmouth College
Nitya Pandalai-Nayar
,
University of Texas-Austin
Basile Grassi
,
Bocconi University
JEL Classifications
- F1 - Trade
- L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance