This website uses cookies.

By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Journal of Economic Literature
  4. March 2012
  5. Economic History or History of Economics? Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius: Review Essay

Journal of Economic Literature

ISSN 0022-0515 (Print) | ISSN 2328-8175 (Online)

Economic History or History of Economics? Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius: Review Essay

  • Orley Ashenfelter
Journal of Economic Literature
vol. 50, no. 1, March 2012
(pp. 96–102)
Download Full Text PDF

Abstract

In this essay, I review Sylvia Nasar's long awaited new history of economics, Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius. I describe how the book is an economic history of the period 1850-1950, with distinguished economists' stories inserted in appropriate places. Nasar's goal is to show how economists work, but also to show that they are people too—with more than enough warts and foibles to show they are human! I contrast the general view of the role of economics in Grand Pursuit with Robert Heilbroner's remarkably different conception in The Worldly Philosophers: The Lives, Times, and Ideas of the Great Economic Thinkers. I also discuss more generally the question of why economists might be interested in their history at all. (JEL B10, B20, B30, N00)

Citation

Ashenfelter, Orley. 2012. "Economic History or History of Economics? Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius: Review Essay." Journal of Economic Literature, 50 (1): 96–102. DOI: 10.1257/jel.50.1.96

JEL Classification

  • B10 History of Economic Thought through 1925: General
  • B20 History of Economic Thought since 1925: General
  • B30 History of Economic Thought: Individuals: General
  • N00 Economic History: General