Research Highlights Article

July 3, 2017

Our favorite data visualizations from the past year

Check out these graphics from the Research Highlight series

AEA Research Highlights

We have published over 100 graphics, data visualizations, and interactive features as part of our Research Highlight series to help spread the word about great economics research appearing in our journals. Below is a sampling of staff favorites from the past year.

¤ 

Colonial-era borders in Africa: In The Long-Run Effects of the Scramble for Africa, authors Stelios Michalopoulos and Elias Papaioannou assessed the consequences of modern-day borders that partition ethnic homelands.

 
Present-day borders in Africa split many ethnic homelands
The map of African ethnolinguistic divisions created by American anthropologist George Peter Murdock in 1959, overlaid with a map of present-day national borders. The Murdock map is based on primary sources and is meant to represent the location of ethnic homelands during the period from 1890–1910. The authors identify 28% of Murdock's 843 regions that are significantly partitioned by present-day borders.
Created with Highcharts 5.0.120246no data/uninhabitednot partitioned by modern borderspartitioned between 2 countriespartitioned between 3 countriespartitioned between 4+ countries
Source: adapted from Figure 1 of Michalopoulos & Papaioannou (2016)
 

Read more: Are colonial-era borders drawn by Europeans holding Africa back?

¤

Beyond GDP: In Beyond GDP? Welfare across Countries and Time, authors Charles Jones and Peter Klenow create an alternative measure of GDP that accounts for factors like inequality and life expectancy.

 
Global inequality may be worse than the GDP statistics suggest
2007 GDP per capita (left) and the authors' welfare measure (right) for 140 countries, both relative to the United States. Countries in Europe, especially eastern Europe, come out ahead thanks to high rates of leisure, longer life expectancies, and lower inequality. Oil-rich countries are penalized for low rates of consumption and high levels of inequality, while lower life expectancies hold back welfare in the AIDS-ravaged countries of southern Africa.
Created with Highcharts 5.0.12GDP per capita (U.S. = 100)Welfare (U.S. = 100)123456789102030405060708090100123456789102030405060708090100
Bosnia/Herz.
France
Albania
Greece
U.K.
Japan
Israel
Italy
Spain
Jamaica
Slovenia
Netherlands
Canada
United States
Portugal
Syria
Armenia
Moldova
Croatia
Slovakia
Sri Lanka
Egypt
Czech Rep.
Poland
Georgia
Hungary
Bulgaria
Bangladesh
Lebanon
Pakistan
Uzbekistan
Sierra Leone
Sudan
Ghana
Turkey
South Korea
Mexico
Tunisia
Ukraine
Senegal
Mali
Latvia
Morocco
Norway
Indonesia
Hong Kong
Uganda
Philippines
Paraguay
Rwanda
Vietnam
Venezuela
Suriname
Yemen
Cambodia
Iraq
Chile
Mongolia
Cote dIvoire
Lao
Brazil
Peru
Djibouti
Mauritania
Panama
India
Thailand
Bolivia
Iran
Nigeria
Kazakhstan
Singapore
Zambia
Azerbaijan
Turkmenistan
Saudi Arabia
Zimbabwe
Namibia
Bahrain
Kuwait
South Africa
Angola
Qatar
Botswana
Honduras
Austria
Niger
Denmark
Madagascar
Ethiopia
Uruguay
China
Australia
Lithuania
Finland
Kenya
Lesotho
Ireland
Serbia
Malaysia
Jordan
Liberia
Sweden
Switzerland
Tanzania
Malawi
Estonia
Gabon
Oman
Congo
Cameroon
Ecuador
Russian Fed.
Cyprus
Macedonia
Tajikistan
Dom. Rep.
New Zealand
Germany
Source: author-supplied data from Jones and Klenow (2016)
 

Read more: What are the GDP data hiding?

¤

The environmental impact of electric cars: In Are There Environmental Benefits from Driving Electric Vehicles? The Importance of Local Factors, authors Stephen Holland, Erin Mansur, Nicholas Muller, and Andrew Yates calculate the local and nationwide impact of driving an electric car in different U.S. cities.

How neighborly is your city's electric car fleet?
Replacing a gas-powered car with an electric model takes a lot of emissions out of the air in the local area over the car's lifetime, and adds some emissions at power plants far away. In some cases, a single electric car can do hundreds of dollars of environmental damage to a distant county over its lifetime by increasing pollutants like NOx, SO2, and particulate matter. Click on each city to see the county-level environmental benefits (and costs) of choosing an electric Ford Focus over a conventional one and driving it for 150k miles.
Created with Highcharts 5.0.12Los AngelesLos AngelesWashingtonWashingtonDenverDenverChicagoChicagoHoustonHoustonDallasDallasAtlantaAtlantaMiamiMiamiMinneapolisMinneapolisNew YorkNew YorkOaklandOaklandPhoenixPhoenixSeattleSeattleSt. LouisSt. Louis-100-50050100Environmental benefit ($)
Note: in some counties, damages and benefits range well above $100.
Source: adapted from supplemental maps in the online appendix to Holland et al. (2016)
 

Read more: Are subsidies for electric cars good for the environment?

¤ 

Stadium subsidy economics: In The Economics of Sports Facilities and Their Communities, authors John Siegfried and Andrew Zimbalist make the case that public subsidies for stadiums are seldom justified by the economic benefits.

A century of ballparks
Data on construction costs and public financing for over 150 major North American stadiums and arenas, from Shibe Park and Forbes Field (1909) to Levi's Stadium (2014). Circles are shaded more darkly for stadiums that received more public funding. Dollar figures are adjusted for inflation to their modern-day equivalents.
Created with Highcharts 5.0.12Year of constructionConstruction cost, millions (2016 dollars)fully privately financedfully privately financedfully publicly financedfully publicly financedpartially publicly financedpartially publicly financed19101920193019401950196019701980199020002010$0$500$1000$1500$2000
 
Read more: Will cities ever break the habit of paying for stadiums?

¤ 

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter for the latest Research Highlights and data visualizations.